EOP & EOC Approaches

Which EOP or EOC works best?

EOP and EOC formats do not need to be aligned. For example, many jurisdictions go with a traditional EOP format but include ESFs into their EOC structure. Also, federal guidance identifies types of information that should be included in an EOP, and functions that should be performed by an EOC, but does not recommend one over another. Choosing the format for your jurisdiction’s Emergency Operations Plan and structure for the Emergency Operation Center can seem a bit overwhelming, but it doesn’t need to be. Every jurisdiction is unique; contact us to discuss your community’s unique needs.

For more information on our program support, visit our website.

EOP Formats

tidalbasingroup.com

Format

Pros

Cons

Most jurisdictions have used this format in the past so they are familiar with it; information is easy to find based on hazard or function. Aligns with the ESF functions at federal, state, and possibly local levels; focus on interdependency of roles and responsibilities. A commonly-used format that may be the best choice for small jurisdictions or private organizations as roles do not change significantly during a response.

Focus is placed more on hazard or function and less on interdependency of roles and responsibilities.

Traditional

May have to cross-reference many sections to find information.

ESF

Responsibilities are not typically as well-defined for different types of hazards or functions; can lead to some confusion during response.

Agency/ Department

EOC Structures

Structure Pros

Cons

Commonly used; understood by field personnel; aligns well with on-scene organization; ample training information available. Very focused on support and coordination; good for home-rule states at the county or regional level; new training available. Becoming more common; aligns with Federal and many state structures; objective-focused; works well in larger jurisdictions and those with complex incidents. Fairly common approach; can be modified to fit the specific needs of a jurisdiction.

May blur the line between field and EOC roles and be difficult for some staff to understand the difference. Recently introduced so not commonly used, but is expected to gain in popularity.

ICS

ISM

In smaller jurisdictions, there may not be enough personnel to support this type of approach.

ESF

Will require additional work on the front-end in planning and training.

Hybrid